data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cff2/6cff2eea6e7aae5ef7a45b6547c0c13261c57b3f" alt="Textwrangler vs bbedit"
#Textwrangler vs bbedit software
TextWrangler seems to have more power under the hood than Smultron, but that hasn't been too important, at least not yet.BBEdit is the leading professional text, code, and markup editor for the Macintosh.Īs the "go to" tool for web site designers, web application developers, writers, and software developers, this award-winning product provides an abundance of high-performance features for editing, searching, and manipulation of text, code, and HTML/XML markup.Īs a replacement for TextWrangler, BBEdit is built by the same developers, using the same award-winning technology, and is identical to TextWrangler in every way you're used to. TextWrangler and I got off to a bad relationship, but after all of these customizations I may actually use it from time to time instead of Smultron, but for the time being it's Smultron's job to lose. TextWrangler also lets you run shell commands and has some interesting AppleScript functionality.
#Textwrangler vs bbedit mac
Positive features include support for the Mac metaphor, speed, spell-checking, and the ability to remove all of the window adornments - a feature I like very much, and included in the blog editor I wrote for my own use. On the positive side, after making customizations to the font, the colors, and which UI widgets are displayed and which aren't displayed, using TextWrangler has been a more pleasant experience of late.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85ca2/85ca268794f3a1c45cc13903b74d060935a1ee64" alt="textwrangler vs bbedit textwrangler vs bbedit"
And like Smultron, I wish TextWrangler offered an auto-complete feature. Instead of being centered, some of the dialogs ended up in the upper-left corner of my display. Another irritation is that dialogs don't end up in the right places. The initial choice of fonts and colors is less than pleasing, and while it seems fast, it's almost frenetically fast - it seems jumpy. I found the initial TextWrangler experience to be very disappointing. Although my initial experience with it was disappointing, it has been growing on me a little bit recently. So, for now, Smultron is my plain-text editor of choice, but TextWrangler has been growing on me recently, and may soon pass Smultron.Ĭoming from the same people that make BBedit, I had great expectations for the BareBones TextWrangler. If Smultron offered an auto-complete language feature for CSS and HTML (it does have support for these languages, but I haven't found an auto-complete feature), I'd probably use it all the time, and not bother with Komodo.
#Textwrangler vs bbedit mac os x
Other than that, the basic Smultron features include: spell-checking, line numbering, the ability to edit multiple files simultaneously, a nice split-window view, full support for the Mac OS X metaphor, the ability to hide most UI widgets, and many other features. Hopefully this is a bug that will be fixed soon. I keep turning off line numbers, and every time I restart Smultron they're back on again. While I'll be using Komodo for editing language files (CSS, HTML, others), I'm currently using Smultron as a plain text editor instead of TextMate, and so far, I like it.īefore I get into the positive features, Smultron currently has one really annoying feature: It keeps forgetting that I don't like to have line numbers displayed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6036/c6036dbf9f0c163004fd5aa27d39588c41ec4718" alt="textwrangler vs bbedit textwrangler vs bbedit"
Other than the application icon they use, Smultron looks as Mac-like as any text editor I reviewed. I just visited the Smultron website, and the author has decided to discontinue development of the project. UPDATE: Smultron is dead long live Smultron.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cff2/6cff2eea6e7aae5ef7a45b6547c0c13261c57b3f" alt="Textwrangler vs bbedit"